AUSTIN — Court Rules Against City’s G-File Practices
A Travis County district court judge has ruled that the City of Austin acted unlawfully by continuing to withhold certain police records known as “g-files”. This decision came down on Friday, following a court order that could significantly impact how police misconduct records are handled in the city.
Understanding G-Files
G-files are internal, confidential documents that contain complaints against police officers. These complaints have not been substantiated with evidence and have not led to any disciplinary actions against the officers. The controversy surrounding these records has sparked public interest and concern regarding police accountability.
Background of the Case
The lawsuit was filed by Equity Action in December 2023. The group demanded that the city implement all measures of the Austin Police Oversight Act, which was passed by voters in May 2023. This act aimed to increase transparency in police operations, including making g-files accessible to the public under the Public Information Act.
Despite the act’s passage, the city maintained its stance on confidentiality, citing its contract with the Austin Police Association.
A Key Ruling from Judge Hexsel
On Friday, Judge Maria Cantú Hexsel specifically pointed out that the city officials, including City Manager T.C. Broadnax and APD Police Chief Lisa Davis, “have unlawfully failed to perform their mandatory duty” to stop using g-files. The ruling indicates a clear judicial objection to the city’s previous practices.
Initially, the lawsuit named former city officials, but the judge’s ruling directly affects current city leaders, leaving them responsible for implementing the necessary changes.
What’s Next for Equity Action?
Although the judge denied Equity Action’s request for a permanent injunction to cease the g-file system, he did not close the case entirely. He noted that after a trial on the merits, a permanent injunction could be considered. This keeps the door open for further legal moves by Equity Action.
Response from the Austin Police Association
The Austin Police Association (APA) responded to the ruling, stating that they are currently evaluating the city’s next steps. The APA has previously stated its opposition to making g-file contents public, expressing concern that the records might include unverified allegations against officers.
City’s Statement
In light of the ruling, the City of Austin released a statement emphasizing their appreciation for the court’s attention to the matter. They mentioned they are in the process of reviewing the decision and plan to discuss potential steps with city leadership in the coming days.
Equity Action’s Celebration
Members of Equity Action expressed their satisfaction with the court’s ruling, calling it “a momentous day for Austin.” Board member Alycia Castillo stated, “Today a judge ruled the city was breaking the law and should end the ‘g-file’ system, the discretionary system used to keep records of police misconduct secret.” Castillo emphasized the importance of transparency in combatting police misconduct and brutality.
Final Thoughts
The court ruling suggests significant changes may be on the horizon for police records in Austin. As discussions continue, many are watching closely to see how the city will respond and adapt to the newfound judicial requirements. This case marks a pivotal point for police accountability and transparency in the city, aligning with the public’s demand for greater oversight of law enforcement practices.
